Failures in satellite components are costly and challenging to address, often requiring significant human and material resources. Embedding a hybrid AI-based system for fault detection directly in the satellite can greatly reduce this burden by allowing earlier detection. However, such systems must operate with extremely high reliability. To ensure this level of dependability, we employ the formal verification tool Marabou to verify the local robustness of the neural network models used in the AI-based algorithm. This tool allows us to quantify how much a model's input can be perturbed before its output behavior becomes unstable, thereby improving trustworthiness with respect to its performance under uncertainty.

Neural network image classifiers are ubiquitous in many safety-critical applications. However, they are susceptible to adversarial attacks. To understand their robustness to attacks, many local robustness verifiers have been proposed to analyze $ε$-balls of inputs. Yet, existing verifiers introduce a long analysis time or lose too much precision, making them less effective for a large set of inputs. In this work, we propose a new approach to local robustness: group local robustness verification. The key idea is to leverage the similarity of the network computations of certain $ε$-balls to reduce the overall analysis time. We propose BaVerLy, a sound and complete verifier that boosts the local robustness verification of a set of $ε$-balls by dynamically constructing and verifying mini-batches. BaVerLy adaptively identifies successful mini-batch sizes, accordingly constructs mini-batches of $ε$-balls that have similar network computations, and verifies them jointly. If a mini-batch is verified, all its $ε$-balls are proven robust. Otherwise, one $ε$-ball is suspected as not being robust, guiding the refinement. BaVerLy leverages the analysis results to expedite the analysis of that $ε$-ball as well as the analysis of the mini-batch with the other $ε$-balls. We evaluate BaVerLy on fully connected and convolutional networks for MNIST and CIFAR-10. Results show that BaVerLy scales the common one by one verification by 2.3x on average and up to 4.1x, in which case it reduces the total analysis time from 24 hours to 6 hours.

A globally robust deep neural network resists perturbations on all meaningful inputs. Current robustness certification methods emphasize local robustness, struggling to scale and generalize. This paper presents a systematic and efficient method to evaluate and verify global robustness for deep neural networks, leveraging the PAC verification framework for solid guarantees on verification results. We utilize probabilistic programs to characterize meaningful input regions, setting a realistic standard for global robustness. Additionally, we introduce the cumulative robustness curve as a criterion in evaluating global robustness. We design a statistical method that combines multi-level splitting and regression analysis for the estimation, significantly reducing the execution time. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our verification method and its capability to find rare and diversified counterexamples for adversarial training.

In recent years, there has been significant attention given to the robustness assessment of neural networks. Robustness plays a critical role in ensuring reliable operation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in complex and uncertain environments. Deep learning's robustness problem is particularly significant, highlighted by the discovery of adversarial attacks on image classification models. Researchers have dedicated efforts to evaluate robustness in diverse perturbation conditions for image recognition tasks. Robustness assessment encompasses two main techniques: robustness verification/ certification for deliberate adversarial attacks and robustness testing for random data corruptions. In this survey, we present a detailed examination of both adversarial robustness (AR) and corruption robustness (CR) in neural network assessment. Analyzing current research papers and standards, we provide an extensive overview of robustness assessment in image recognition. Three essential aspects are analyzed: concepts, metrics, and assessment methods. We investigate the perturbation metrics and range representations used to measure the degree of perturbations on images, as well as the robustness metrics specifically for the robustness conditions of classification models. The strengths and limitations of the existing methods are also discussed, and some potential directions for future research are provided.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains, but their vulnerability to adversarial attacks poses serious safety risks. Existing neuron-level methods using limited data lack efficacy in fixing adversaries due to the inherent complexity of adversarial attack mechanisms, while adversarial training, leveraging a large number of adversarial samples to enhance robustness, lacks provability. In this paper, we propose ADVREPAIR, a novel approach for provable repair of adversarial attacks using limited data. By utilizing formal verification, ADVREPAIR constructs patch modules that, when integrated with the original network, deliver provable and specialized repairs within the robustness neighborhood. Additionally, our approach incorporates a heuristic mechanism for assigning patch modules, allowing this defense against adversarial attacks to generalize to other inputs. ADVREPAIR demonstrates superior efficiency, scalability and repair success rate. Different from existing DNN repair methods, our repair can generalize to general inputs, thereby improving the robustness of the neural network globally, which indicates a significant breakthrough in the generalization capability of ADVREPAIR.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are at the forefront of cutting-edge technology, and have been achieving remarkable performance in a variety of complex tasks. Nevertheless, their integration into safety-critical systems, such as in the aerospace or automotive domains, poses a significant challenge due to the threat of adversarial inputs: perturbations in inputs that might cause the DNN to make grievous mistakes. Multiple studies have demonstrated that even modern DNNs are susceptible to adversarial inputs, and this risk must thus be measured and mitigated to allow the deployment of DNNs in critical settings. Here, we present gRoMA (global Robustness Measurement and Assessment), an innovative and scalable tool that implements a probabilistic approach to measure the global categorial robustness of a DNN. Specifically, gRoMA measures the probability of encountering adversarial inputs for a specific output category. Our tool operates on pre-trained, black-box classification DNNs, and generates input samples belonging to an output category of interest. It measures the DNN's susceptibility to adversarial inputs around these inputs, and aggregates the results to infer the overall global categorial robustness of the DNN up to some small bounded statistical error. We evaluate our tool on the popular Densenet DNN model over the CIFAR10 dataset. Our results reveal significant gaps in the robustness of the different output categories. This experiment demonstrates the usefulness and scalability of our approach and its potential for allowing DNNs to be deployed within critical systems of interest.

Robustness is widely regarded as a fundamental problem in the analysis of machine learning (ML) models. Most often robustness equates with deciding the non-existence of adversarial examples, where adversarial examples denote situations where small changes on some inputs cause a change in the prediction. The perceived importance of ML model robustness explains the continued progress observed for most of the last decade. Whereas robustness is often assessed locally, i.e. given some target point in feature space, robustness can also be defined globally, i.e. where any point in feature space can be considered. The importance of ML model robustness is illustrated for example by the existence of competitions evaluating the progress of robustness tools, namely in the case of neural networks (NNs) but also by efforts towards robustness certification. More recently, robustness tools have also been used for computing rigorous explanations of ML models. In contrast with the observed successes of robustness, this paper uncovers some limitations with existing definitions of robustness, both global and local, but also with efforts towards robustness certification. The paper also investigates uses of adversarial examples besides those related with robustness.

Neural networks are susceptible to privacy attacks. To date, no verifier can reason about the privacy of individuals participating in the training set. We propose a new privacy property, called local differential classification privacy (LDCP), extending local robustness to a differential privacy setting suitable for black-box classifiers. Given a neighborhood of inputs, a classifier is LDCP if it classifies all inputs the same regardless of whether it is trained with the full dataset or whether any single entry is omitted. A naive algorithm is highly impractical because it involves training a very large number of networks and verifying local robustness of the given neighborhood separately for every network. We propose Sphynx, an algorithm that computes an abstraction of all networks, with a high probability, from a small set of networks, and verifies LDCP directly on the abstract network. The challenge is twofold: network parameters do not adhere to a known distribution probability, making it difficult to predict an abstraction, and predicting too large abstraction harms the verification. Our key idea is to transform the parameters into a distribution given by KDE, allowing to keep the over-approximation error small. To verify LDCP, we extend a MILP verifier to analyze an abstract network. Experimental results show that by training only 7% of the networks, Sphynx predicts an abstract network obtaining 93% verification accuracy and reducing the analysis time by $1.7\cdot10^4$x.

Deep Learning (DL) is increasingly used in safety-critical applications, raising concerns about its reliability. DL suffers from a well-known problem of lacking robustness, especially when faced with adversarial perturbations known as Adversarial Examples (AEs). Despite recent efforts to detect AEs using advanced attack and testing methods, these approaches often overlook the input distribution and perceptual quality of the perturbations. As a result, the detected AEs may not be relevant in practical applications or may appear unrealistic to human observers. This can waste testing resources on rare AEs that seldom occur during real-world use, limiting improvements in DL model dependability. In this paper, we propose a new robustness testing approach for detecting AEs that considers both the feature level distribution and the pixel level distribution, capturing the perceptual quality of adversarial perturbations. The two considerations are encoded by a novel hierarchical mechanism. First, we select test seeds based on the density of feature level distribution and the vulnerability of adversarial robustness. The vulnerability of test seeds are indicated by the auxiliary information, that are highly correlated with local robustness. Given a test seed, we then develop a novel genetic algorithm based local test case generation method, in which two fitness functions work alternatively to control the perceptual quality of detected AEs. Finally, extensive experiments confirm that our holistic approach considering hierarchical distributions is superior to the state-of-the-arts that either disregard any input distribution or only consider a single (non-hierarchical) distribution, in terms of not only detecting imperceptible AEs but also improving the overall robustness of the DL model under testing.